Added: Feb 3, 2008
From: Autoblock321
Duration: 0:29
Most people think the theory of evolution was first proposed by Charles Darwin, and rests on scientific evidence, observations and experiments. However, the truth is that Darwin was not its originator, and neither does the theory rest on scientific proof. The theory consists of an adaptation to nature of the ancient dogma of materialist philosophy. Although it is not backed up by scientific discoveries, the theory is blindly supported in the name of materialist philosophy. This fanaticism has resulted in all kinds of disasters. Together with the spread of Darwinism and the materialist philosophy it supports, the answer to the question "What is a human being?" has changed. People who used to answer: "Human beings were created by God and have to live according to the beautiful morality He teaches", have now begun to think that "Man came into being by chance, and is an animal who developed by means of the fight for survival." There is a heavy price to pay for this great deception. Violent ideologies such as racism, fascism and communism, and many other barbaric world views based on conflict have all drawn strength from this deception. The Darwinist Lie: 'Life is conflict' Darwin set out with one basic premise when developing his theory: "The development of living things depends on the fight for survival. The strong win the struggle. The weak are condemned to defeat and oblivion." According to Darwin, there is a ruthless struggle for survival and an eternal conflict in nature. The strong always overcome the weak, and this enables development to take place. The subtitle he gave to his book The Origin of Species, "The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life", encapsulates that view. Furthermore, Darwin proposed that the 'fight for survival' also applied between human racial groups. According to that fantastical claim, 'favoured races' were victorious in the struggle. Favoured races, in Darwin's view, were white Europeans. African or Asian races had lagged behind in the struggle for survival. Darwin went further, and suggested that these races would soon lose the "struggle for survival" entirely, and thus disappear: At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace the savage races throughout the world. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.1 The Indian anthropologist Lalita Vidyarthi explains how Darwin's theory of evolution imposed racism on the social sciences: His (Darwin's) theory of the survival of the fittest was warmly welcomed by the social scientists of the day, and they believed mankind had achieved various levels of evolution culminating in the white man's civilization. By the second half of the nineteenth century racism was accepted as fact by the vast majority of Western scientists.2 I really really really really really really advise you to Visit these websites cos' i can't upload any of these videos :( Yusuf Estes - Evolution and Creation Part 1: http://lightuponlight.com/islam/modules.php?name=Stream2&file=index&lid=103 Yusuf Estes - Evolution and Creation Part 2: http://lightuponlight.com/islam/modules.php?name=Stream2&file=index&lid=104 also visit this website cos' it explains how evolution is wrong in Details http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/
Channel: Tech
Tags: darwin darwinism evolution is wrong
Rating: 1.65 (37 ratings) Views: 1912' favoriteCount='2 Comments: 25
anarchycastro Says:
May 24, 2008 - of course they don't know anything about geology and any other science, where do you think ignorance comes from? it sure as hell doesnt come from knowledge...
Autoblock321 Says:
May 24, 2008 - i accidentaly deleted some guys comment, it was somthing like "what a cock of shit.." i wanted to reply NOTE: i am using 'on screen keyboard' coz my real keyboard is stuffed up, meaning im really slow at typing replys. until i get my keyboard fixed or get a new one... remember... those who opose my ideas, don't bother influencing ppl with your crappy insults. encorage ppl to study 'my spelling sucks coz im usuing on screen keyboard for disabled ppl'
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 24, 2008 - true, if that is the case, they shouldnt decide on their beliefs until theyve learned concepts of science. The only creationists i have respect for are the ones who disagree with science after learning about it. The average creationists, much like the ones on these forums, are fools.
anarchycastro Says:
May 24, 2008 - how to prove creationism right - Get emhpirical evidence that proves Woman did indeed come from a mans rib...
bob1qaz Says:
May 24, 2008 - Hahahaha trust me, I would not be saying that if I did not know anything about ecology and earth science there is flat out no evidence of man-made global warming, just because the charts are skewed and magnified and pretty doesn't mean there real. Look up the facts look for the proof of man-made global warming there is none!
bob1qaz Says:
May 24, 2008 - Hahaha, you make me laugh "When in doubt convert to moles" There is no evidence of man-made global warming.
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 25, 2008 - that wasnt the point of my post to prove you wrong, it was to point out that u are using that as an excuse to believe theories are blindly supported, which they are not. As stated before... "Independent scientific studies on Geology, Anthropology, Chemistry, Biology, Astronomy, among others, support Evolution. "
bob1qaz Says:
May 25, 2008 - That is simply not true. I know plenty of scientists that are christians and that includes a biologist/ecologist, chemistry professor and a geology teacher. Majority does not mean anything.
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 25, 2008 - Often it does, how many geologists believe the Earth is 6000 years old? How many evolutionists or biologists believe evolution is a joke? How many chemists deny the work of Miller?
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 25, 2008 - also, to not acknowledge the effects of human interaction with the environment would be a very hast judgement as well, i think you need to re examine your ecology, after all, carbon dioxide concentrations havnt been this high for what...650,000 years.
bob1qaz Says:
May 25, 2008 - Hahahaha trust me I know an ecologist professor you think I would say global warming is not man made without knowing the facts LOL!!! carbon dioxide is irrelevant.
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 25, 2008 - you said there was no evidence to support the idea that man effects global warming, that is a lie. Also, there are creationist scientists, but their numbers are meager in comparison to scientists with agnostic beliefs.
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 26, 2008 - does this ecology professor believe the Earth is 6000 years old?
nerzul82 Says:
May 26, 2008 - i went through the info and you lack of knowledge is mind rattling. how can you not say that life is conflict? if we didn't live in a world where we can grow our own food, ure sickness, and kill animals both bigger and stronger than us, we WHOULD be in an every lasting battle for the things we take for granted!Infact up untill we were the modern man that is what life was! how can any one say that is not true?!
nerzul82 Says:
May 26, 2008 - i ment to say "how can you say life is NOT conflict"
hornedbeast91 Says:
Jun 2, 2008 - your an idiot natural selection is the opposite of random
Autoblock321 Says:
Jun 4, 2008 - Hornedbeast91 your allowed to comment here but don't insult me plz and thank you
hornedbeast91 Says:
Jun 4, 2008 - your whole description is an attack on darwin
kakamana1000 Says:
Jun 7, 2008 - Listen man Harun Yahya is not a scientist, he is an idiot! Evolution has stood strong for 160 years and NOBODY has ever shown it to be wrong. If it were to ever happen the person doing so would win a Nobel Prize, so the incentive is there but its never happened. Get yourself an education in the field.
Autoblock321 Says:
Jun 8, 2008 - Harun yahya is not an idiot and evolution is not standing strong, even if it was i'll say "so what?" Islam has stood even stronger. Evolution is proven to be wrong just read harun yahya's book or visit the links i show at the bottom of the info. And also Read the book "evolution deceite"
hottasha8274 Says:
Jun 8, 2008 - Evolution proves that there is NO such thing as race in the first place. Anyone that knows the basic theory of evolution knows that there is no biological difference between any human on earth. We are all exactly the same. The only difference is skin color, hair type, and individual characteristics which are all within human variation. To say that evolution encourages or even supports racisism is rediculous.
hottasha8274 Says:
Jun 8, 2008 - And in your comments you said to search for evidence of global warming and how its caused by human presence? Maybe you should take your own advice! I could sit here and write a freakin novel about how the presence of humans is directly related global warming but I don't have to because thousands of others already have! You had done nothing but make yourself look like a fool! Its almost laughable your lack of knowledge on either subject! The evidence is undeniable.
hottasha8274 Says:
Jun 8, 2008 - Instead of searching for 'the evidence against global warming and evolution', which must produce some interesting information, try searching for 'the evidence FOR evolution and global warming' and you might just be surprised by how much information, evidence, facts, statistics, and logical theories there are out there.
Autoblock321 Says:
Jun 9, 2008 - ok look, i've uploaded this video 4 months ago. Everytime I reply to someone then some other guy comes in and does the same thing (mostly hate comment) so I'm going to give you an advice and that is to do YOUR own research and find out the truth for yourself personally (and that goes to all you people who's reading this comment). So uhh...yea im closing this comment section down, from now on it's either you believe me or don't.
thecommonsenseguy Says:
May 23, 2008 - bob1qaz, this arguement/rebuttle is a joke, do you know anything about "Geology, Anthropology, Chemistry, Biology, Astronomy"? I bet you dont, otherwise you'd recognize that your response is flat out ignorant.