Added: Dec 31, 2007
From: thefifthseal
Duration: 10:15
In this video former FBI chief Ted Gunderson interviews Helena Stoeckley, now deceased, who was one of the satanic cult members who murdered the family of Dr. Jeffrey MacDonald during the night of February 17, 1970. Helena describes in vivid detail how she was high on drugs and perpetrated this murderous blood-letting with other members of her satanic cult. Dr. MacDonald was prosecuted for the crime by the U.S. Government to cover for the cult and cover up the fact that the cult and U.S. Army worked together to import illegal drugs from Southeast Asia. He remains wrongfully imprisoned today because law enforcement authorities refused to act on Helena's confession to release this innocent man. Hollywood produced the movie 'Fatal Vision' based on these murders. http://www.free10dvds.com http://www.themacdonaldcase.org/ http://thesenatorhillary.blogspot.com http://www.scribd.com/doc/533316/Information-on-the-Dr-Jeffrey-MacDonald-Investigation
Channel: News
Tags: army conspiracy coverup cult dr drugs family jeffrey macdonald murder satanic
Rating: 4.33 (6 ratings) Views: 5411' favoriteCount='17 Comments: 48
tiggeresstoes Says:
Jun 26, 2008 - jeff maconald is guilty the evidence does not match what he says why are people fooled by his lies? he should rot in jail
Fooligan7 Says:
Jun 30, 2008 - Read the transcripts and the evidence of the case. Jeffrey MacDonald is guilty, he did it. Only someone who hasn't bothered to look at all the evidence would suggest he is innocent. Rot in prison, MacDonald!
littledrummerboi3 Says:
Jul 10, 2008 - He Ate My cuzin
Federalette Says:
Jul 17, 2008 - I have read everything that I could find on this case, watched interviews with MacDonald, and I have to conclude that he is guilty. I would prefer to have found something to exonerate him, but it's just not there for me.
LauraLinger Says:
Jul 18, 2008 - I've seen the autopsy photos of Colette, Kim, and Kris, and then photographs of the "injuries" sustained by the Inmate, supposedly from all of those hippies in his house. You cannot imagine the carnage inflicted on the girls until you see it for yourself. MacDonald had NOTHING. NOTHING.
rrmross Says:
Jul 20, 2008 - There is a lot of evidence against him but what gets me the most is that I have never seen him talk about how much he misses his wife and kids- not one time.
coastalstray Says:
Jul 22, 2008 - She talks about witchcraft and satanism as if they are the same thing when they're 2 entirely different religions.
cmsmhp Says:
Jul 30, 2008 - thefifthseal, it saddens me that you have just completely fallen for MacDonald's schtick. My dad, who worked for the Fayetteville Observer throughout the 1970s and 1980s, has talked with Stoeckley multiple times. He is completely convinced that she was not involved in the murders.
sukirue Says:
Jul 31, 2008 - My husband and I have read about this case for years. A lot of evidence has been simply ignored. People who claim he is guilty have failed to explain the unidentified hair found in the palm of his wifes hand, as well as synthetic hairs found on a hairbrush. It's so much easier to say he's guilty. Been a MacDonald supporter for years now, still think he's innocent and always will.
moni41173 Says:
Aug 3, 2008 - They already proved the hair clutched in Colette's hand was Jeff's. It was made public several months ago. The hair under Krstin's nail remain unidentified.
sukirue Says:
Aug 4, 2008 - Made public where? And why would the baby have an unidentified hair?
moni41173 Says:
Aug 4, 2008 - Made public in all the news!! Look it up!!! The hair under Kristin's nail is unidentified meaning it did not match anyone in the house.
sukirue Says:
Aug 4, 2008 - I know what unidentified means. LOL. There's just some evidence that isn't explained, like the hair under Kristin's fingernail. I'll have to do some catch up reading on the case but I believe there was also some wig hair found in the apartment as well.
moni41173 Says:
Aug 5, 2008 - That is what I was referring to. We may never know who the hairs belonged to. Back in the 1970's, hands werent bagged in the morgue.
AlphaKillaX Says:
Aug 21, 2008 - these white people with their satanic cults,....wtf is going on in this world
sukirue Says:
Aug 27, 2008 - I also believe he is innocent.
sukirue Says:
Aug 27, 2008 - Good, be scared!
jksonny Says:
Aug 28, 2008 - This lady's story is ridiculous and so is Gunderson. Her story varies wildly and her accounts don't even match JM's. JM is a sociopath and he murdered his family in cold blood. There is no evidence of anyone else in the house. Think about this: Colette, weighing just more than 100lbs., fought so hard that both arms were broken and she was mutilated - stabbed, clubbed, etc. JM, a Green Beret in excellent physical condition, had minor injuries, some of which were caused by Colette herself.
jksonny Says:
Aug 28, 2008 - 1. Why did JM lie about a boxing trip to Russia if the marriage was as happy as he claimed? 2. Why would 6 hippies (the min. poss. according to his story) enter a home w/out weapons? 3. Why would they drop those weapons just outside the door? 4. Why did JM behave as he did on the Dick Cavett show? (smiling, laughing, never asking for assistance in finding the killers) 5. Why are hundreds of pj fibers all over the rest of the house but hardly any in the room where he claimed it was torn/cut?
jksonny Says:
Aug 28, 2008 - 6. Why did he lie about killing one of the murderers? 7. How did pj fibers get underneath Colette? 8. How did pj fibers get underneath the 'PIG' headboard? 9. Why did the defense not find/depose/question any of HS's supposed accomplices? 10. How was JM able to describe his attackers in total darkness (except for a "candle")? 11. If he heard his oldest daughter screaming/fighting, why was she found lying in bed? Does JM claim the "killers" put her back in bed after crushing her skull?
jksonny Says:
Aug 28, 2008 - 12. Why is JM's blood in the hall sink? 13. Why is there hardly any blood in the living room? 14. Why would he throw the pj top over Colette unless he was trying to explain the blood? 15. HS claims she rode the childs' rocking horse but says the spring was broken. How does JM/Gunderson explain the crime scene photos that show the springs intact? 16. Why has he refused a polygraph or sodium pentathol exam? 17. Why did he lie about which daughter wet the bed?
jksonny Says:
Aug 28, 2008 - 18. Why did he slip and refer to the couch as the "bed" 3 times in his CID interview? There were no other such slips. 19. Why did he react so disinterested once he was finally in the same room as the "evil" HS (the woman that supposedly helped murder his family)? 20. Why does he lie that Colette didn't know about his affairs? There are hundreds more questions like these that have only one explanation: MacDonald is a murderer and a sociopath.
izze422 Says:
Oct 9, 2008 - I have to write a paper on this case for a class and i found this very intresting. theres so many things to think about in this case. so many ppl say he didnt do it. i feel he did though. this case is huge to say on one thing that he is guilty or inoccent...BUT in the case he said that he removed the knife from his wifes chest before the MP got there. There wee no finger prints found on the knife. later on it was proven that the knife was not even a weapon. thats pretty crazy
jksonny Says:
Oct 11, 2008 - The people who think he's innocent are not familiar with the details of the case. They only know the surface-level issues normally discussed on television. My advice is to buy the book 'Fatal Vision' and read the section dealing with the Grand Jury proceedings. I don't see how any rational person can read MacDonald's testimony and think he's anything other than a dangerous, self-obsessed sociopath, bordering on psychopath. He's just another version of Scott Peterson and OJ.
tiggeresstoes Says:
Jun 26, 2008 - jeff mac is guilty i cant believe you think hes innocent you are deluded and stupid