Genesis hidden in the Chinese language? Part 2

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - i believe it is traditional Chinese my friend, though there are quite a few variations of the Chinese written language

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - thanks bro

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - no problem my friend

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - i will post another vid on the subject soon, the Almighty willing.

dogsieh Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - i have heard lectures based on this. its quite awesome.thanks for doing these videos lazbo.

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - thanks for the encouraging words my friend

QuietBuck Says:

Mar 24, 2008 - Thats cool that you are doing this. I am doing similar with Native American items. Found out they know the name YHWH and even have a moses stone w/ the 10 commandments along with other items.

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 25, 2008 - tell me more

Obznana Says:

Mar 27, 2008 - Maybe Japanese has the same "Genesis" influenced characters in its written language. I don't know but it may be worth finding out. God Bless Mark. I hope that you realise that I am the former KraljAlek.

lazbo4174 Says:

Mar 27, 2008 - i do know that you were formerly KraljAlek my friend, have not looked at the japanese but maybe there is something in it

AnonymousCommentator Says:

Apr 5, 2008 - 1st time I see this! Thanks dude!

acatalf2 Says:

May 15, 2008 - This is all very generic...you could analyze it many ways. For instance, you can create pottery and bricks from dirt and mud. You can create speech with your mouth. Many living things have the ability to walk and breathe. I dont see why this is proof of any kind. You could find any such generic grouping of meanings and create some sort of connection. Please explain why chinese shouldnt be able to have such characters if god doesnt exist.

lazbo4174 Says:

May 15, 2008 - there are many chinese characters that depict portions of the Genesis account. There are hundreds of flood legends worldwide, ancient cultures had a knowledge of the God of the Bible and the stories found therein

acatalf2 Says:

May 15, 2008 - That does not constitute proof...a coincidence is only that...when you can give proof that these characters could not have by any other method except through divine intervention been placed into the chinese language, then you will have proof...until then you are just making loose comparisons of definitions to a story that you think is true. It could be done for pretty much any story with such general words.

jingwu42 Says:

May 29, 2008 - yes i agree, and plus if you know anything aobut actual history you would know mud is the first form of construction and that could be what there trying to illistrate, this is all very fantastic, what next "mongolian prooves the existance of a seven headed chicken named gregory" this is just as fantastical as whatn i jsut said

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 25, 2008 - to those whom established the Chinese language, those particular components' definitions are what constituted the larger definition of "create". Thus merging them together to form the individual character which means "create". What would be so particularly exceptional about pottery & bricks that forming the character "create" would be with them in mind? That they would be included along with mouth/breath, life/animation,and walk? Which are profound and basic elements of life and human existence

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 25, 2008 - "acatalf", Whats the connection between pottery & bricks with speech,walking & breathing? Whats amazing about the Chinese character is that when compared to Genesis, their likeness is suggestive of a connection between the whole character, & the components & Genesis. However, even without comparison to Genesis, it is a fact that the ancient Chinese did indeed see those components of the character and their respective definitions as related to eachother & create. Therefor the focal point is that,

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 25, 2008 - "acatalf"(when you can give proof that these characters could not have by any other method except through divine intervention been placed into the chinese language, then you will have proof) You may not realize it, but this kind of demand only ensures you that there can never be proof. Since the only proof which would be acceptable to you, would be naturalistic/materialist proof. However, you want the "smoking gun" to be evidential of something thats supernatural/immaterial in its nature.

acatalf2 Says:

Jun 26, 2008 - If there is no physical evidence for something you believe in, if there is no way to ascertain whether it is even real, then most likely its not. What I'm asking for isn't impossible at all. Proof is needed for everything else in the world besides religious beliefs. The written Chinese language has changed DRAMATICALLY since its invention. The current symbols used are phonetic, whereas the original bone script was actually almost completely a picture based writing. Do some research

acatalf2 Says:

Jun 26, 2008 - From an article I read: Following the same logic demonstrated in some of the examples shown in World Bible School's site, the best example I can think of is the Chinese character, 呆. 呆 could be broken down into three parts. The top part 口 is "mouth", and it could also be interpreted as "speaking" or "talking", perhaps even "praying". Below 口 is 十, which clearly it is a cross. The cross has a very strong significance in Christian religion, since Jesus Christ was crucified on it.

acatalf2 Says:

Jun 26, 2008 - On top of the cross is 人, it is one of the very basic Chinese characters that represents "person".According to Christian Bible, the last thing Jesus Christ did when he was nailed to the wooden cross was asking for forgiveness of all mankind. Clearly, the character 呆 represents the situation of a 人 (person) on a 十 (the cross) and 口 (praying). Who else would it be none other than Jesus Christ? If Chinese was truly "Language of God", then why does 呆 mean "stupid" and "dull-minded"?

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 26, 2008 - "acatalf" You say "clearly" the character represents a situation in which, amongst other things, that + means Christ. But is that "clear" really? In this video the producer has presented exactly what the components within the character truely represent in the Chinese language. I may be wrong, but I suspect that you or somebody have merely taken the liberty of attributing the + Chinese component with a Christ definition. But what does it truly represent in the Chinese language?

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 26, 2008 - Also, I don't know if you've seen something produced by believers which is promoting Chinese as "The Language of God". Perhaps you have, but from what I've gathered from this 3 part series, of which I have yet to see 3. It seems to me, the producer is not claiming Chinese to be the language of God. But rather,simply that when the people were dibursed after the tower of Babel, that some of them may have gone on to establish the Chinese language. The only language that is of God is Hebrew.

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 28, 2008 - "acatalf"(If there is no physical evidence for something you believe in, if there is no way to ascertain whether it is even real) Then why do you believe in natural selection? The theory says that organisms themselves do not contain the ability to select traits which to adopt, since it was allegedly originaly done by organisms without brains. So natural selection has to be something apart from the organism. Where is it? In what form does it exist? To fit in, it must be of nature and material.

Chuichupachichi Says:

Jun 28, 2008 - "acatalf"(The written Chinese language has changed DRAMATICALLY since its invention) What does that matter since the characters presented in these videos are obviously ones which date back to the original system. Thats what matters since what is being proposed in this video, is the possibility of that the early Chinese were people who were at the tower of Babel.