Roger Federer vs Pete Sampras (5-5)

juandi2570 Says:

Sep 14, 2008 - hahahahah ok mate, i bet that you would marry federer if you could. Are you in love with the fedexpress? Listen man, Fed will never dominate tennis the why did before coz he's getting old and the new guys are pretty damn good. Nadal is the world's number one has roger's number.

juandi2570 Says:

Sep 14, 2008 - No hay nada. Yo también voy con Nadal.

vishnuthegreat Says:

Sep 14, 2008 - i bet a year ago,u were sayin fed neva gona gt beat, no 1 can touch him. an course, i wanna marry him. seems lke u feel the sme bout nadal sunshine. an nadal is brill but he cnt sustain it for lng, and fed will be bck at the top.

tonydjx Says:

Sep 15, 2008 - federer the best tennis player ever nadal the best clay court player

theone225 Says:

Sep 16, 2008 - These two are exactly the same players

rolf85 Says:

Sep 20, 2008 - exactely the same players????

riessypiecy Says:

Sep 21, 2008 - Sampras was the best player in tennis history. He had no weaknesses, served like a god, had the best shot the game has ever seen (his running forehand), his athleticism was second to none and was able to play great on every surface. So don't say Sampras was a bad player.

niclassj Says:

Sep 21, 2008 - Correction: Federer's forehand was voted as the best tennis shot of all time.

riessypiecy Says:

Sep 21, 2008 - I'm talking about running forehand not forehand in general.

niclassj Says:

Sep 22, 2008 - Yep, I know, but still. Federer's forehand was voted as the best tennis shot in the history. Not Pete's running forehand.

riessypiecy Says:

Sep 22, 2008 - Oh ok I get you now. Do you think Roger has a better running forehand than Pete?

Andaguiii Says:

Sep 27, 2008 - federer le gana a todos en verdad sampras es fino pero ya se retiro ahora el mejor del Universo Roger Federer

TibxB0i Says:

Sep 27, 2008 - i think sampras would've done great for selling the wilson kblade if he was still playing. he looks great with a black racquet and they probably would've had him use a black kblade tour 93. i know he uses 90 like fed but they'd sell a lot, a k61 and a kblade wow

TibxB0i Says:

Sep 27, 2008 - feds done against nadal, but hes still a challenge to djokovic but djokovic is getting better too

vishnuthegreat Says:

Sep 28, 2008 - nah, i dnt think so. i think as long as fed can play like the way he did in the semi and finals of the US, he can beat anybody. because form is temporary, but class is permenant!

itigibm Says:

Sep 28, 2008 - class cant beat nadal nowadays, think that other players get better and fed stayed the same. And of course, any top ten can beat any top ten.

xtr3lla Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - really?please tell me where I can get more informacion about it!!

niclassj Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - Try google.

xtr3lla Says:

Sep 30, 2008 - ¬¬! ahahah thaNks!

americatenis96 Says:

Oct 3, 2008 - amazing match...memorable

RafaeINadal Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - federer had mononucleosis this year, its a realy annoying condition that you cant detect easily without blood tests. it can take months to recover completely. in between you experience flu like sypmtoms and this makes you think that it was just a cold but it lingers about the body for a while. federer is still a major contender even against nadal.

tyruk Says:

Oct 5, 2008 - I'd pay a SHIT-LOAD of dough to have seen a prime-Sampras against a prime-Federer; that would have been the match of the century.

ribcat Says:

Oct 5, 2008 - i would pay a shit-load for palin-clinton-hilary 3 some video too.

rockerduff1231 Says:

Oct 5, 2008 - literally...federer's century is the 21st and pete's is the 20th...so it'd be like the Match of the Adjacent Centuries

tyruk Says:

Oct 6, 2008 - Well done, sir. The Secret Service are currently on their way to your location. (Joke) I lol'd, I admit it.