| Home || UK Radio || |

Added: Jul 21, 2007

From: punkie999

Duration: 6:26

+++FORWARD THIS VIDEO TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW - NOW!!!+++ This, my friends, is the ultimate clip regarding WMD lies - the clip we have all been waiting for. All the lies of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell compiled together, brilliantly done, with some great "extra" material. +++This clip is now also online with Spanish subtitles - spread the message!! LINK: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Am0vKUJy9U +++Background music: THE KILLERS: ALL THE THINGS THAT I HAVE DONE+++ ___ ATTENTION: A shortened version without swearwords is now online - so that you can post this clip in forums in which swearwords are not allowed: http://youtube.com/watch?v=0L5ZQ1usR-w ___ Thanks a lot to my friend Sally from California for bringing this clip to my attention! Make sure that at the next elections this bunch of liars gets thrown out of the White House - forever and ever. This clip was created by: http://www.puppetgov.com --- By the way: In this scene when Cheney says "it's pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague and met with Iraqi officials", Cheney was referring to Mohammed Atta. --- +++STAND UP, WE ARE NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANY MORE!!!+++ NOTE: You have watched this clip, and you are STILL not convinced that Bush did anything wrong? Then you should read about the already infamous, top-secret "DOWNING STREET MEMO" - exposing that the West knew very well that Saddam was NOT a threat and that the war was ILLEGAL. Links: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article387374.ece http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downing_Street_memo Excerpt from the Downing Street Memo (about the Cabinet meeting on 23rd July 2002): "(...)C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.(...) It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help with the legal justification for the use of force. The Attorney-General said that the desire for regime change was not a legal base for military action. There were three possible legal bases: self-defence, humanitarian intervention, or UNSC authorisation. The first and second could not be the base in this case. Relying on UNSCR 1205 of three years ago would be difficult. The situation might of course change." +++UPDATE+++ Here is another link proving the lies: http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/sidney_blumenthal/2007/09/turning_truth_into_lies.html

Channel: News

Tags: barack  bush  cheney  cia  dick  donald  george  impeach  intelligence  iraq  kucinich  lies  obama  palin  powell  rice  rove  rumsfeld  sarah  war  wmd  wolfowitz 


Rating: 4.88 (2148 ratings)    Views: 266037' favoriteCount='2703    Comments: 3932

dulutely Says:

Oct 1, 2008 - When I think about the huge number of Americans and Iraqis who died because of the lies of the Bush administration, it just makes me depressed. And think of what Sean Penn said. Weird.

Harry557 Says:

Oct 2, 2008 - Bush and his administration should be tried for crimes against humanity. Also how come America can have weapons of mass destruction and use them with impunity. Bombing countries back to the stone age. Who are the terrorist's, the ones with the bombs strapped to their backs or the ones with the cruise missiles.

skwrrl70 Says:

Oct 2, 2008 - "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" philosophy." OK, let me get this straight, you're saying this is a "liberal" philosophy? Does that make Henry Kissinger a liberal? Your post doesn't make any sense. I'm so tired of morons who talk about "libs" this and "libs" that. In Thomas Jefferson's day, he was a "liberal." Apparently nowadays all "liberal" means is "person who disagrees with current Republican president and hates Walmart."

cupera1 Says:

Oct 3, 2008 - Henry Kissinger is no conservative. History lesson Jefferson fought a war against Islamic extremists that had demanded tribute from countries with sea trade. Thomas refused and sent the US Navy and Marines to say no more. After he left office the congress went back to paying tribute. Libs lost their pair in the 60's and have sought appeasement with ANY foreign power that want to destroy the USA.

cupera1 Says:

Oct 3, 2008 - John Kerry > October 9, 2002 "I will be voting to give the president of the US the authority to use force if necessary to disarm Saddam because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."

cupera1 Says:

Oct 3, 2008 - Bush is incredible to get the intelligence changed with out being in the White house Dick Durbin > September 30, 1999 "One of the most compelling threats we in this country face today is the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Threat assessments regularly warn us of the possibility that North Korea, Iran, Iraq, or some other nation may acquire or develop nuclear weapons."

cupera1 Says:

Oct 3, 2008 - spoken by a true National Socialist

Rayzor71 Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - They should have all been thrown in jail..can't even call him a president..he's an abomination..he should be stricken from all the history books...there should just be a big Void stamped in it's place...we cannot make this mistake again...Ever..

hebber1961 Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - who was the reporter at 1:00? good for him!

hebber1961 Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - i've never been one for protesting etc but man this issue needs more or it. why are Americans letting their politicians get away with this? these people should be out of office if not in jail!

RothMichaelJ Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - George Bush can fuck right off, sharpishly.

Plutonwolf Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - So how about explaining the payoffs to the militias in Iraq? Go ahead, take your time, we have all the time in the world, you folks have 1 month.

Moviebro Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - No End In Sight. Watch it!

CrankyOldShit Says:

Oct 4, 2008 - The ever more sophisticated weapons piling up in the arsenals of the wealthiest and the mightiest can kill the illiterate, the ill, the poor and the hungry, but they cannot kill ignorance, illness, poverty or hunger. --Fidel Castro

kenlucas77 Says:

Oct 5, 2008 - a very well-done vid!

PYTHAGORAS101 Says:

Oct 5, 2008 - WMD = DUBYA of MASS DECEPTION

mygamerguyaccount Says:

Oct 6, 2008 - WELL WE CAN SEE THE OBVIOUS! HELLO! Its what you call weak. Thats your government. Weak because they failed! So vulnerable to one man who YOU gave the most power! Is that the government you want? People need to look outside the box. If it doesn't work right, why continue using it?

marxhale Says:

Oct 7, 2008 - exactly we cannot make this mistake again thats why we should not stricken him from the history books, or a Hitler will rise again learn from mistakes, not hide them

Hereticbooks Says:

Oct 7, 2008 - Lying bastards! And so...why is it that Americans are so willing to follow like blind sheep to a McCain administration which is nothing more than MORE OF THE SAME lying politics that do nothing more than line their own pockets.

Hereticbooks Says:

Oct 7, 2008 - ...how about prosecuting them all for high treason? It won't happen. Nothing will hinder the election. I think it's very likely that charges will be brought....but if McCain wins the presidency, they'll just be pardoned...just like Scooter Libby...and Richard Nixon. Lie, deceive, murder....it doesn't matter to these criminals....Bush's own grandfather sold out american troops helping hitler to power for money.

iknowabouteverything Says:

Oct 9, 2008 - Believe me my friend it's all very simple to understand... there was "some between the lines" till Vietnam... but nowadays it's a piece of cake knowing why a politician makes some assertion... because it's repeating over and over again ... so there's a repititive pattern of: ACCUSATION & LIES->SPREAD BY MASS MEDIA->THREATENING->WAGING WAR->KILLING THOUSANDS->THE DIFFICULT TASK OF PLANNING AN EXIT STRATEGY Now tell me which war has been different than the above from vietnam forth???

xFrequentC Says:

Oct 9, 2008 - Great Video.

Meanie83 Says:

Oct 10, 2008 - Brilliant video.

Meanie83 Says:

Oct 10, 2008 - People wake up, there is no difference between Obama and McCain. They just want you to think there is. While they are battling over details, the big subjects aren't battled, because they are the same. They hold a little sweet in front of your noses, so you swallow all the sour that comes with it.

akaCharlieG Says:

Oct 10, 2008 - This video needs to have its views in the millions. Everyone who reads this post, please send this to 10 friends at least.